How is it that Africans as slaves better than many American Indians to the colonial British North America?

a. African cultures and African genotype were significantly lower than those of Europeans and Africans have been easy to dominate. b. Africans have not had the advantage of having their king, he was a slave. C. Africans were far from any government that would represent them; Black Africans were clearly visible in the colonial British North America, they were branded as slaves for hundreds of years before the British engaged in the slave trade. d. African cultures were inferior and included many cruelties, even their own brand of slavery, They wore costumes unknown, had weird customs, and when they arrived in the western hemisphere deserved slavery.

Africans were so easily visible. They also did not have anywhere to run to the indigenous population have been less welcoming. They probably easier to obtain – the Europeans have bought from dealers on the coast of Africa in general. Africans were probably physically stronger but not resistant to European diseases. Also slavery was not something that the natives practiced a large extent and perhaps the nation settlers want to offend the Native Americans at a time when they were not strong enough to resist attack. Officials involved European origin have been used, but a mixture of climate and the lack of numbers makes this impossible. Finally Africa had a seemingly endless hapless victims. You just werent people.

Operation Torch Invasion of North African 01-08